Evictly

Reyaz v Gibson

Landlord wins · Toronto · 2025-06-10

Adjudicator
Camille Tancioco
Dispute
Personal Use, Review Of Order (Serious Error)
Notice
Personal use (N12)
Landlord
S.R., M.S.S.
Tenant
S.A.G.
Tenant rep
Shahrzad Rahimi

What happened

The Landlords' application to evict the Tenant for personal use was granted. The Tenant requested a review of this decision, alleging a serious error. The Tenant argued that the original member failed to properly consider the Landlords' prior eviction attempts as evidence of bad faith, and that the delay in receiving the order constituted a procedural error, causing the compensation cheque to become stale-dated. The review request was denied, with the Board finding no serious error in the original order or proceedings.

The ruling

The Tenant's request to review the eviction order was denied. The adjudicator found no serious error in the original decision, which granted the Landlords' application for personal use. The arguments that the original member failed to consider evidence and that the delay in issuing the order was a procedural error were both rejected. The original order, which postponed the eviction until June 30, 2025, is confirmed and remains in effect.