Sidhu v Golding
Landlord wins · Brampton · 2025-12-09
- Adjudicator
- Jane Dean
- Dispute
- Non-payment of Rent, Personal Use
- Notice
- Non-payment of rent (N4), Personal use (N12)
- Amount
- $10-20K
- Landlord
- A.S., R.D.
- Tenant
- M.G., G.M.
- Landlord rep
- Silvat Syed
What happened
The Landlords initially applied for eviction based on non-payment of rent and personal use. A consent order was reached in October 2025 where the Tenants agreed to terminate the tenancy by November 30, 2025, and pay rent for October and November. The Tenants breached this order by failing to pay October's rent, leading to an ex-parte eviction order. The Tenants subsequently filed a motion to set aside that order, claiming unspecified 'difficulties' and alleging that the original N12 notice was served in bad faith.
The ruling
The Tenants' motion to set aside the eviction order was denied. The stay of the eviction order was lifted immediately. The adjudicator found that the Tenants breached the consent order by failing to pay rent and provided no valid reason to delay the eviction, especially since the arrears had reached at least $19,321.66 and they had already agreed to leave by November 30, 2025.