Sooriyahetti v Dogar

Tenant wins · Brampton · 2025-04-22

Adjudicator

Candace Aboussafy

Dispute

Damage to Property, Failure To Pay Utility Costs, Overcrowding, Persistent Late Payment, Substantial Interference

Landlord

D.S., S.S.

Tenant

A.A.D., A.M.

What happened

The Landlords filed a request to review a previous order (LTB-L-076740-24-AM) that dealt with their application for eviction and compensation due to multiple issues including damages, substantial interference, and late rent. The Landlords argued the adjudicator made a serious error by not including HST in the damage award of $3,900.00. The review request was denied without a hearing.

The ruling

The Landlords' request to review order LTB-L-076740-24-AM is denied. The adjudicator found no serious error in the original decision, particularly in the calculation of damages, as the evidence provided by the Landlords regarding HST was unclear. The original order is confirmed and remains unchanged.