LTB Order LTB-L-002904-23
- Citation
- 2023 ONLTB 19768
- Decided
- 2023-02-07
- Rental unit
- 12, 14 TORBOLTON DRIVE ETOBICOKE ON M9W3Y2
- Landlord
- C.A.
- Tenant
- the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 2023 ONLTB 19768 (CanLII) Citation: Charmant Apartment v Jalin, 2023 ONLTB 19768 Dat
- RTA section
- s. 21.2
Order under Section 21.2 of the
Statutory Powers Procedure Act
and the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
2023 ONLTB 19768 (CanLII)
Citation: C.A. v Jalin, 2023 ONLTB 19768
Date: 2023-02-07
File Number: LTB-L-002904-23-RV
In the matter of: 12, 14 TORBOLTON DRIVE
ETOBICOKE ON M9W3Y2
Between: C.A. Landlord
and
Richard Jalin Tenants
Amanda Halley
ORDER
C.A. (the “Landlord”) applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict
Richard Jalin and for an order to have him pay the rent he owes because he failed to meet a
condition specified in the order issued by the Board on May 9, 2022, with respect to application
TNL-34887-21.
The Landlord’s application was resolved by Order TNL-37142-22 issued on October 7, 2022. A
motion to set aside order TNL-37142-22 was filed.
The motion was heard by videoconference on November 14, 2022. By Order TNL-37142-22-SA
issued on December 9, 2022, the motion to set aside was dismissed as abandoned and the stay
of order TNL-37142-22 issued October 7, 2022 was lifted effective immediately.
On January 6, 2023, Richard Jalin and Amanda Halley (the ''Tenants”) requested that order TNL-
37142-22-SA issued on December 9, 2022 be reviewed and that the October 7, 2022 ex parte
eviction order TNL-37142-22 be stayed until the request to review is resolved.
On January 10, 2023, Order LTB-L-002904-SA-RV-IN issued, staying the order issued on
October 7, 2022.
The request was heard by videoconference on January 23, 2023.
The Landlord’s Agent, Allan Shafman, the Tenants’ Legal Representative, Yodit Edemariam, and
the Tenant, Amanda Halley, attended the hearing. Unless otherwise specified, references to the
Tenant singular are to Ms. Halley.
Order Page 1 out of 4
File Number: LTB-L-002904-23-RV
Determinations:
Preliminary Issue
1. The Tenant submitted both she and her husband are tenants. She testified both she and
2023 ONLTB 19768 (CanLII)
her husband signed a copy of the lease in 2015 when the rental unit was rented with the
former Superintendent.
2. The Landlord’s Agent advised they do not have a copy of a written lease and it was his
understanding the tenant was Richard Jalin. Nonetheless, the Landlord was open to
naming Amanda Halley as a tenant.
3. In the above circumstances, the application was amended to name Amanda Halley as a
tenant.
Request to Review
4. The Tenants’ Request to Review alleges they were not reasonably able to participate in
the hearing held on November 14, 2022.
5. The Tenant testified they never received a copy of the Notice of Hearing.
6. The Board’s records indicate the Notice of Hearing was emailed to the incorrect email
address for the Tenants. The Board’s records do not show the Notice of Hearing was
otherwise sent to the Tenants.
7. The Landlord’s Agent admitted he had not given a copy of the Notice of the Hearing to the
Tenants.
8. In these circumstances, I find it more likely than not the Tenants did not receive the Notice
of Hearing. As a result, I find the Tenants were not reasonably able to participate in the
hearing and have not had an opportunity to be heard.
9. The Tenants’ request to review was granted and the Tenants’ motion to set aside
proceeded to a hearing on the merits.
Tenants’ Motion to Set Aside
10. The first issue to consider on this Tenants’ motion to set aside order TNL-37142-22, issued
on October 7, 2022, is whether the Tenants breached the previous conditional order as
alleged by the Landlord in their application.
11. The Tenant admitted they failed to meet the payment terms in Order TNL-34887-21,
issued by the Board on May 9, 2022. The Tenant testified she paid rent on August 4, 2022
and not on August 1, 2022. The Tenant initially testified they did not make any other late
payments; however, on cross-examination the Tenant admitted rent had also been paid
late for June as it was paid on June 2, 2022.
12. The second issue to consider as mandated under s. 78(11)(b) of the Residential
Tenancies Act, 2006 (the ‘Act’) is whether or not it would be unfair in all of the
circumstances to set aside the eviction order.
Order Page 2 out of 4
File Number: LTB-L-002904-23-RV
13. The original application was for persistent late payment of rent. The Tenants were
provided with the opportunity to preserve their tenancy on the condition they pay rent in full
and on time for period of one year.
14. The Tenant testified they paid rent late in June and August as she had to wait to get paid
2023 ONLTB 19768 (CanLII)
to pay rent.
15. The Tenant testified she is now working again Full-Time and will set aside money in
advance to ensure rent is paid on time and is able to seek assistance from her parents, as
was done in August to pay rent for three months in advance, if necessary.
16. The Tenants have lived at the rental unit since 2015. They have two minor children who
attend the local school. The Tenant testified they do not have local family with whom they
can stay. She also testified she has been unable to find equivalent affordable
accommodation.
17. The Landlord’s Agent testified they have a large loan on the residential complex for which
payments are due at the end of each month. I find that rent payments that are late by a few
days do not impact the Landlord’s ability to make payments on this loan.
18. The Landlord’s Agent also testified they cannot be left wondering if and/or when they are
going to get paid each month. No application was brought for breach after the late
payment in June and this application was commenced after the second late payment in
August.
19. While the amount of time by which the rent payments were late was minor, they
nonetheless continued the pattern of problematic behaviour of concern to the Landlord and
which the Tenants previously said they would cease.
20. That said, in July 2022 rent was paid three days in advance. In September 2022, the
Tenants voluntarily paid three months in advance. December’s rent was paid on time and
on January 1, 2023, the Tenant asked the Superintendent if she could pay rent but testified
this payment was refused given the then eviction order. Rent was accepted after the
eviction order was stayed.
21. As a result, I find the most recent pattern of behaviour is that of paying on time. When
considered in conjunction with the residence of two minors in the building, the fact that
payments were late by a short period of time, the Tenant’s evidence of new measures put
in place to prevent this going forward and the lack of evidence of any specific impact of the
late payment by these Tenants on the Landlord outside of concern, I find it would not be
unfair to set aside the eviction order. The Tenants are cautioned further incident may not
be viewed favourably by the Board.
22. The Tenant advised she was amenable to extending the original consent order by a further
two months to compensate for the months they did not pay rent on time. The Landlord
requested a further 12 months and noted the lump sum portion of the timely payments was
made by a third party. This order is issuing on May 31, 2023. In the above circumstances, I
have extended the conditions in the original order to add another 6 months but delayed the
requirement to pay June’s rent until June 9, 2023.
Order Page 3 out of 4
File Number: LTB-L-002904-23-RV
It is ordered that:
1. Amanda Halley is added as a tenant to the application.
2. The Tenants’ request to review Order TNL-37142-22-SA issued on December 9, 2022 is
2023 ONLTB 19768 (CanLII)
granted. The order is cancelled.
3. The Tenant’s motion to set aside Order TNL-37142-22 issued on October 7, 2022 is
granted. The order is cancelled.
4. The Landlord’s application TNL-37142-22 under section 78 of the Act is dismissed.
5. Order TNL-34887-21 issued on May 9, 2022, is cancelled and replaced with the following:
1. The Tenants shall pay rent to the Landlord for the month of June 2023 on or before
June 9, 2023, and from July 2023 through to November 2023, on or before the 1st day
of each and every month.
2. If the Tenants fail to make any payment in accordance with paragraph 1 of the order,
the Landlord may, without notice to the Tenant, apply to the Board, pursuant to
section 78 of the Act for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenant. The
landlord must make this application no later than 30 days after the Tenant’s breach of
paragraph of this order.
May 31, 2023
Date Issued Rebecca Case
Member, Landlord and Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor Street, 1st Floor
Toronto ON M7A 2G6
If you have any questions about this order, call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
Order Page 4 out of 4