LTB Order LTB-L-002914-23
- Citation
- 2023 ONLTB 37595
- Decided
- 2023-05-16
- Rental unit
- 1107, 2777 KIPLING AVE ETOBICOKE ON M9V4M2
- Landlord
- Q Res V Operating LP
- Tenant
- Y.O.
- RTA section
- s. 77(8)
Order under Section 77(8)
2023 ONLTB 37595 (CanLII)
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Citation: Q Res V Operating LP v Y.O., 2023 ONLTB 37595
Date: 2023-05-16 File Number:
LTB-L-002914-23-SA
In the matter of: 1107, 2777 KIPLING AVE
ETOBICOKE ON M9V4M2
Between: Q Res V Operating LP Landlord
And
Y.O. Tenant
Q Res V Operating LP (the 'Landlord') applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict
Y.O. (the 'Tenant').
The Landlord's application was resolved by order LTB-L-002914-23, issued on March 6, 2023.
This order was issued without a hearing being held.
The Tenant filed a motion to set aside order LTB-L-002914-23.
The motion was heard by videoconference on May 8, 2023.
The Landlord’s Agent, Qendresa Bugacky, the Landlord's Legal Representative, Debbesha
Morris, and the Tenant attended the hearing.
Determinations:
1. After considering all of the circumstances, I find that it would be unfair to set aside order
LTB-L-002914-23.
2. The Tenant does not dispute that she breached order LTB-L-016357-22, issued on October
5, 2022. At that time the arrears owing to September 30, 2022 was $4,100.00.
The Tenant confirms that she did not pay the rent for November 2022 on or before
November 1, 2022 and that she did not pay $400.00 towards the arrears on or before
November 20, 2022.
3. As of the date of the hearing, the arrears have more than doubled. The amount owing to
May 31, 2023 is now $9,373.11.
4. The Tenant explained that she breached because her client passed away which reduced
her income and she couldn’t make the payments as agreed. She says that she is now
employed with a company and makes approximately $6,000.00 a month. She says her son
is now also working and will help pay the arrears.
2023 ONLTB 37595 (CanLII)
Order Page 1 of 2
File Number: LTB-L-002914-23-SA
5. While I am mindful of the Tenant’s explanation, they do not disclose a change in the
Tenant’s circumstances that was not reasonably foreseeable to the Tenant when the order
on consent was entered. At that time the Tenant was likely aware or should reasonably
have been aware of the precarious nature of her work and the possibility of lost income due
to clients passing away. Further, the Tenant breached the October 5, 2022 order shortly
after it was issued, and the Tenant continued to breach the order resulting on the arrears
more than doubling. I also note that the Tenant did not provide evidence to support that she
is now employed and making approximately $6,000.00 per month. Documents such as a
job letter or a pay stub from her employer would have sufficed and these documents should
reasonably be available to the Tenant.
6. Having regard to the above, I am not satisfied that the Tenant would comply with another
payment plan. Accordingly, it would be unfair to grant the Tenant’s motion to set aside.
7. The stay of order LTB-L-002914-23 is lifted on June 16, 2023. The Tenant requires some
time to move and the Landlord was not opposed to a delay of 30 days.
It is ordered that:
1. The motion to set aside Order LTB-L-002914-23, issued on March 6, 2023, is denied.
2. The stay of Order LTB-L-002914-23 is lifted on June 16, 2023.
May 16, 2023 ____________________________
Date Issued Khalid Akram
Member, Landlord and Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto
ON M7A 2G6
If you have any questions about this order, call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
Order Page 2 of 2
2023 ONLTB 37595 (CanLII)