LTB Order LTB-L-003921-22
- Citation
- 2023 ONLTB 18894
- Decided
- 2023-02-02
- Rental unit
- 27 MAIN ST MISSISSAUGA ON L5M1X5
- Landlord
- P.M.
- Tenant
- the 2023 ONLTB 18894 (CanLII) Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 Citation: Majidi v Callery, 2023 ONLTB 18894 Date: 2023-02
- RTA section
- s. 21.2
Order under Section 21.2 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act and the
2023 ONLTB 18894 (CanLII)
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Citation: M. v Callery, 2023 ONLTB 18894
Date: 2023-02-02 File Number:
LTB-L-003921-22-RV
In the matter of: 27 MAIN ST
MISSISSAUGA ON L5M1X5
Between: P.M. Landlord
And
Edward Callery Tenant
Review Order
P.M. (the 'Landlord') applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Edward
Callery (the 'Tenant') because:
• the Landlord in good faith requires possession of the rental unit for the purpose of
residential occupation for at least one year.
The Landlord also claimed compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the
termination date.
This application was resolved by order LTB-L-003921-22 issued on December 21, 2022.
On January 24, 2023, the Tenant requested a review of the order and that the order be stayed
until the request to review the order is resolved.
A preliminary review of the request was completed without a hearing.
Determinations:
1. The Tenant submits that the order contains a serious error and that they were not
reasonably able to participate in the proceedings.
2. On the basis of the submissions made in the request, I am not satisfied that there is a
serious error in the order or that a serious error occurred in the proceedings or that the
Tenant was not reasonably able to participate in the proceeding.
3. The submissions made in the request are the same submissions made at the hearing. The
presiding adjudicator recites some of these submissions in the order. Despite the Tenant’s
submissions, the adjudicator finds that the Landlord more than likely has a genuine
intention to reside in the rental unit for the purposes of residential occupation for a period
of at least one year. In doing so, the order applies the relevant case law that sets out the
2023 ONLTB 18894 (CanLII)
Order Page 1 out of 2
test for “good faith” to the facts of this case. The order provides adequate reasons
explaining how and why the presiding adjudicator decided the matter. The order is
therefore an adequate order.
4. The Tenant also submit that they were not reasonably able to participate in the hearing.
The December 21, 2022 order, however, shows that the Tenant was afforded – and
exercised – an adequate opportunity to address the issues raised in the application. As
mentioned earlier in these reasons, the order recites some of the Tenant’s evidence. This
demonstrates that the Tenant was able to lead evidence and introduce submissions during
the proceeding. The Tenant was therefore afforded procedural fairness.
5. While the presiding adjudicator did not allow documents submitted by the Tenant, the order
gives reasons that explain why the documents were not considered – they were not
disclosed in accordance with the Rule 19.1 of the Board’s Rules of Procedure. A party who
fails to comply with the rules of disclosure may not rely on the evidence that was not
disclosed (Rule 19.7). Accordingly, the presiding adjudicator was entitled to not allow the
Tenant to rely on the documents that were not disclosed in accordance with the rules.
6. The request to review seeks to revisit the presiding adjudicator’s decision. While the
Tenant clearly disagrees with the decision, the purpose of the review process is not to
provide parties with an opportunity of relitigating the issues in hopes of achieving a
different outcome. I would not interfere with the assessment of the evidence by the
presiding adjudicator, who was in the best position to assess the credibility of the parties
and had the opportunity of hearing the evidence in its totality.
7. As the Tenant’s request to review fails to allege a serious error or that the Tenant was not
reasonably able to participate in the proceedings, the request must be denied.
It is ordered that:
1. The request to review order LTB-L-003921-22, issued on December 21, 2022, is denied.
2. The order is confirmed and remains unchanged.
February 2, 2023 ____________________________ Date Issued
Khalid Akram
Member, Landlord and Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto
ON M7A 2G6
2023 ONLTB 18894 (CanLII)
Order Page 2 out of 2