LTB Order LTB-L-015684-23
- Citation
- 2023 ONLTB 62725
- Decided
- 2023-09-12
- Rental unit
- 110 GLEN LONG AVE NORTH YORK ON M6B2M5
- Landlord
- I.K.
- Tenant
- M.I.B.
- RTA section
- s. 77(8)
Order under Section 77(8)
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
2023 ONLTB 62725 (CanLII)
Citation: K. v B., 2023 ONLTB 62725
Date: 2023-09-12 File Number:
LTB-L-015684-23-SA
In the matter of: 110 GLEN LONG AVE
NORTH YORK ON M6B2M5
Between: I.K. Landlord
And
M.I.B. Tenant
I.K. (the 'Landlord') applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict M.
I. B. (the 'Tenant') because the Tenant entered into an agreement to terminate the
tenancy.
The Landlord's application was resolved by order LTB-L-015684-23, issued on May 9, 2023. This
order was issued without a hearing being held.
The Tenant filed a motion to set aside order LTB-L-015684-23.
The motion was heard by videoconference on June 13, 2023.
The Landlord, the Landlord’s representative Howard Tavroges, the Landlord’s witness V.
Langhani, the Tenant and the Tenant’s son M. I. attended the hearing.
Determinations:
1. The first issue on a motion to set aside, such as this one, is whether or not the parties
entered into an agreement to terminate the tenancy.
2. It was disputed that on February 16, 2023 the Tenant and the Landlord signed an
agreement to terminate the tenancy as of February 28, 2023 (Form N11). The Tenant
did not move out of the rental unit by the termination date as set out in the agreement.
3. The Tenant submitted that she was tricked into signing the N11. The Tenant testified
that some man came to the rental unit in February 2023 (date unspecified) and gave
her the notice to sign, she thought she was singing a new lease that she had
requested of the Landlord to support her claim for ODSP benefits.
Order Page 1 of 3
4. The Landlord did not dispute that while the original tenancy commenced in January
2021, the Tenant asked for a new lease for purposes of supporting her ODSP benefit.
File Number: LTB-L-015684-23-SA
2023 ONLTB 62725 (CanLII)
A new lease for a 6-month duration was signed by the parties on February 6, 2023 for
a lease commencing February 1, 2023.
5. The Landlord testified that she attended at the rental property on February 16, 2023
along with her brother and father as witnesses and signed the N11 agreement to end
the tenancy. At that time, it was agreed to by the parties that the last month’s rent
deposit would be applied to the month of February 2023 and that the Tenant had
requested two months of rent as compensation to vacate the rental unit.
6. The Tenant did not remember the meeting. She has not been paying the lawful
monthly rent of $3,112.00, the last payment received by the Landlord was for January
2023.
7. As of the date of the hearing the arrears of rent were $12,448.00. When asked about
why she had not been paying the rent the Tenant said because the Landlord had lied
to her.
8. The agreement to lease between the parties as entered into the Board’s record and
as commencing February 1, 2023 stipulated that rent is payable on the first (1st) of
each month.
9. The Tenant’s allegations of the Landlord lying predate the events that give rise to the
Landlord’s L3 application filing, that is the payment of rent was not made on or before
February 1, 2023 and the N11 was not executed until February 16, 2023.
10. For the reasons below, I am satisfied that the parties agreed to terminate the tenancy
as of February 28, 2023.
11. The Landlord said she attended the rental property on February 16, 2023 and the
parties mutually drafted and signed the N11 notice. The notice as submitted into the
Board’s record has an addendum of a handwritten page three (3) in which it is noted
that the Landlord agreed to pay the Tenant two (2) months of rent, equal to
$6,224.00 in exchange for the keys to the rental unit and for vacant possession.
12. The Landlord’s brother, the witness V. Langhani submitted that he attended the rental
unit with his sister on February 16, 2023 to request payment of rent and that an
agreement to end the tenancy was entered into without any form of coercion. The
Landlord went to a copy center nearby and returned with copies of the agreement for
each of the parties.
Order Page 2 of 3
13. On review of the N11, the parties signed the document not only on page two (2) of
the agreement but then again on page three (3), the page that describes the
agreement of payment by the Landlord of the equivalent of two months of rent, if the
Tenant vacated the rental unit.
14. The fact that the Tenant negotiated the payment of two months of rent to vacate,
signed the N11 and again the addendum, I find that the Tenant ought to have known
2023 ONLTB 62725 (CanLII)
the agreement she was entering into.
File Number: LTB-L-015684-23-SA
15. Based on the evidence before the Board, I have no reason to doubt the truthfulness
of the Landlord’s or the witness testimony, on the contrary, the Tenant provided a lack
of particulars and was vague with respect to dates, events or people attending at the
rental unit.
16. After considering all of the circumstances, I find that it would be unfair to set aside
order LTB-L-015684-23.
17. The stay of order LTB-L-015684-23 is lifted immediately.
It is ordered that:
1. The motion to set aside Order LTB-L-015684-23, issued on May 9, 2023, is denied.
2. The stay of Order LTB-L-015684-23, is lifted immediately.
3. Order LTB-L-015684-23 is unchanged.
September 12, 2023 ____________________________
Date Issued Alicia Johnson
Member, Landlord and Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto
ON M7A 2G6
If you have any questions about this order, call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
Order Page 3 of 3