LTB Order LTB-L-020556-22
- Citation
- 2023 ONLTB 73728
- Decided
- 2023-11-02
- Rental unit
- Main Floor Unit, 3 Janet Court Hamilton Ontario L8E4X8
- Landlord
- H.L.
- Tenant
- the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 Citation: Le v Steeves, 2023 ONLTB 73728 Date: 2023-11-02 File Number: LTB-L-020556-
- RTA section
- s. 21.2
2023 ONLTB 73728 (CanLII)
Order under Section 21.2 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act and the
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Citation: Le v Steeves, 2023 ONLTB 73728
Date: 2023-11-02
File Number: LTB-L-020556-22-RV2
In the matter of: Main Floor Unit, 3 Janet Court Hamilton
Ontario L8E4X8
Between: H.L. Landlord
And
Jennifer Steeves Tenant
Review Order
H.L. (the 'Landlord') applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Jennifer Steeves
(the 'Tenant') because:
• the Landlord in good faith requires possession of the rental unit for the purpose of
residential occupation for at least one year;
• the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the
residential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful
right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant;
• the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the
residential complex has wilfully or negligently caused damage to the premises;
• the Tenant or another occupant of the rental unit has committed an illegal act or has carried
out, or permitted someone to carry out an illegal trade, business or occupation in the rental
unit or the residential complex.
The Landlord also claimed compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the
termination date.
This application was resolved by order LTB-L-020556-22-RV issued on September 27, 2023.
Order Page 1 of 4
File Number: LTB-L-020556-22-RV2
On October 27, 2023, the Tenant requested a review of the order and that the order be stayed
until the request to review the order is resolved.
2023 ONLTB 73728 (CanLII)
A preliminary review of the request was completed without a hearing.
Determinations:
1. Rule 26.18 of the Board’s Rules of Procedure is waived.
2. On the basis of the submissions made in the request, I am not satisfied that there is a
serious error in the order or that a serious error occurred in the proceedings or that the
Tenant was not reasonably able to participate in the proceeding. Therefore, the review
request is denied.
Background
3. This application was originally heard on June 2, 2022 and October 19, 2022. At the original
hearing, the Tenant's Legal Representative indicated that they were not challenging the
“good faith” intention of the Landlord (Part 2 of 2 Hearing Recording, at 1 hr:23 min).
4. As a result, order LTB-L-020556-22 was issued on April 26, 2023, terminating the tenancy.
The Tenant requested a review of the April 26, 2023 order on the basis that the hearing
member had failed to consider all the circumstances in deciding whether or not to grant
discretionary relief from eviction.
5. On May 25, 2023, order LTB-L-020556-22-RV-IN was issued directing the matter to a
review hearing to determine whether the Board erred by failing to admit and consider
evidence pursuant to subsection 83(2) of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the ‘Act’).
6. The review was heard on June 21, 2023 and July 10, 2023. At the review hearing, the
parties agreed a serious error occurred in the proceedings because the original member
did not hear evidence and submissions on whether to delay or deny the eviction.
Accordingly, the review was granted.
7. While the review was granted, the reviewing member declined to revisit the issue of
whether the Landlord gave the notice of termination in good faith because the Tenant
conceded that the Landlord gave the notice in good faith during the October 19, 2022
hearing date. Instead, the reviewing member limited the hearing to whether relief from
eviction should be granted pursuant to section 83 of the Act.
The Review Request
8. The submissions in the Tenant’s second request to review seek to establish the N12 notice
was given in bad faith and allege the reviewing member seriously erred by not allowing the
Order Page 2 of 4
File Number: LTB-L-020556-22-RV2
Tenant’s the ability to present evidence and cross examine the Landlord’s witness with
respect to the validity of the N12 and the Landlord’s “good faith” intention.
9. Rule 26.15 of the Board’s Rules of Procedure says that if the request to review is granted,
2023 ONLTB 73728 (CanLII)
the reviewing member will identify the issues to be re-heard. The reviewing member’s
decision to limit the issues to be re-heard to section 83 considerations only was
appropriate and reasonable in the circumstances of this case. The Tenant did not
challenge the “good faith” of the Landlord at the original hearing. The matter was referred
to a review hearing on the issue of whether section 83 of the Act was considered. The
decision to limit the re-hearing to section 83 considerations was therefore not a serious
error.
10. The Tenant’s assertion that they did not concede that the Landlord in good faith requires
the rental unit is not supported by the record. During the original hearing on October 19,
2022, at approximately 1 hr: 23 minutes on the record, the Landlord was testifying about
her intentions with respect to the residential complex. At this point, the Tenant's Legal
Representative interrupted the Landlord’s testimony and said:
Does it make a difference if I concede to the fact that based on the declarations, I acknowledge [the
Landlord] requires it in good faith. . . I’m willing to concede that point for the purpose of moving the
argument along.
11. Given the above concession, the Landlord’s burden of proving their good faith intention
was dispensed with. The good faith intention of the Landlord was not raised as an issue
Tenant’s review request. The basis of the Tenant’s review request was whether the hearing
member adequately considered relief from eviction. Therefore, it was reasonable for the
reviewing member to limit the re-hearing to this issue only.
12. The reviewing member’s approach is also consistent with the Board’s obligation to adopt
the most expeditious method of determining the questions arising in a proceeding that
affords all persons directly affected by the proceedings an adequate opportunity to know
the issues and be heard on the matter: See section 183 of the Act. The questions arising in
this proceeding were: (1) whether the original member considered relief from eviction; if
not, (2) whether to grant mandatory or discretionary relief from eviction. These issues were
reasonably set out in the Tenant’s review request and the May 25, 2023 interim order both
of which, the record reveals, were sent to the parties.
13. The Tenant submits that they were not heard and did not receive a fair hearing. I disagree.
The recording reveals that the Tenant was given an adequate opportunity to lead evidence
and cross-examine the Landlord on the relevant issues. The order recites some of the
relevant evidence and submissions made by the parties throughout the hearing. This
demonstrates that the parties were able to lead evidence and introduce submissions
during the proceedings.
Order Page 3 of 4
File Number: LTB-L-020556-22-RV2
14. While the Tenant's Legal Representative was interrupted by the reviewing member at
various times throughout the hearing, I do not find that these interruptions resulted in a
denial of procedural fairness or the right to be heard. I say this because the various
2023 ONLTB 73728 (CanLII)
interruptions were for the purpose of limiting the evidence to the relevant issues in the
proceeding. The reviewing member was authorized to do this pursuant to the Board’s
powers to control its proceedings and subsection 23(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure
Act, RSO 1990, c S.22.
15. Despite the Tenant’s submission, the record does not support that the reviewing member
acted inappropriately or discriminated against Tenant's female Legal Representative.
16. For the reasons above, the Tenant has failed to establish there is a serious error in the
order or in the proceedings. Therefore, the Tenant’s request to review must be denied.
It is ordered that:
1. The request to review order LTB-L-020556-22, issued on September 27, 2023, is denied.
The order is confirmed and remains unchanged.
November 2, 2023 ____________________________
Date Issued Khalid Akram
Member, Landlord and Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto
ON M7A 2G6
If you have any questions about this order, call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
Order Page 4 of 4