LTB Order LTB-L-020839-23
- Citation
- 2023 ONLTB 45850
- Decided
- 2023-06-23
- Rental unit
- basement, 167 KENILWORTH AVE S HAMILTON ON L8K2T5
- Landlord
- H.D.
- Tenant
- M.H.
- RTA section
- s. 69
Order under Section 69
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
2023 ONLTB 45850 (CanLII)
Citation: Marie D. v M.H., 2023 ONLTB 45850
Date: 2023-06-23
File Number: LTB-L-020839-23
In the matter of: basement, 167 KENILWORTH AVE S HAMILTON
ON L8K2T5
Between: H.D. Landlords
Marie D.
And
M.H. Tenant
H.D. and Marie D. (the 'Landlords') applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and
evict M.H. (the 'Tenant') because the Tenant did not pay the rent that the Tenant
owes (L1 Application).
H.D. and Marie D. (the 'Landlords') also applied for an order to terminate the tenancy
and evict M.H. (the 'Tenant') because the Tenant, another occupant of the rental
unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has substantially interfered with
the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlords or another tenant
and the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the
residential complex has wilfully or negligently caused damage to the premises.
H.D. and Marie D. (the 'Landlords') also applied for an order requiring M.
H. (the 'Tenant') to pay the Landlords’ reasonable out-of-pocket costs the Landlords
have incurred or will incur to repair or replace undue damage to property. The damage was
caused wilfully or negligently by the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the
Tenant permitted in the residential complex (L2 Application).
This application was heard by videoconference on June 14, 2023.
The Landlords Marie D. and the Tenant M.H. attended the hearing.
Order Page: 1 of 7
File Number: LTB-L-020839-23
Determinations:
L1 Application
1. At the hearing the Landlords relied on oral submissions and referred to documents to
2023 ONLTB 45850 (CanLII)
support their application. The Tenant was also given an opportunity to provide submissions
and evidence.
2. The Landlords served the Tenant with a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Nonpayment
of Rent (N4 Notice). The Tenant did not void the notice by paying the amount of rent
arrears owing by the termination date in the N4 Notice or before the date the application
was filed.
3. As of the hearing date, the Tenant was still in possession of the rental unit.
4. The lawful rent is $1,600.00. It is due on the 1st day of each month.
5. Based on the Monthly rent, the daily rent/compensation is $52.60. This amount is
calculated as follows: $1,600.00 x 12, divided by 365 days.
6. The Tenant has paid $900.00 to the Landlords since the application was filed.
7. The rent arrears owing to June 30, 2023 are $6,500.00. This was not disputed by the
Tenant.
8. The Landlords incurred costs of $186.00 for filing the application and is entitled to
reimbursement of those costs.
9. The Landlords collected a rent deposit of $1,600.00 from the Tenant and this deposit is still
being held by the Landlords. The rent deposit can only be applied to the last rental period
of the tenancy if the tenancy is terminated.
10. Interest on the rent deposit, in the amount of $16.99 is owing to the Tenant for the period
from January 11, 2023 to June 14, 2023.
L2 Application
11. On March 2, 2023, the Landlords served the Tenant an N5 notice of termination. The
termination date in the notice was March 23, 2023. The allegations on the N5 notice are:
a) On January 22, 2023, dogs were crying in the night.
b) On January 27, 2023, there was a smell of smoke inside the unit, coming up
through the vents to the upper unit.
c) On, February 11, 2023, there was a smell of marijuana smoke coming up through
the vents to the upper unit. The upper tenants had to close their vents to avoid the
smell.
Order Page: 2 of 7
File Number: LTB-L-020839-23
d) Between February 12 to February 15, 2023, the was a smell of marijuana smoke
and the Tenant was seen blowing.
e) On February 10, 2023, there was damage to the common hallway wall above the
door from the basement because the Tenant was moving in furniture.
2023 ONLTB 45850 (CanLII)
f) On February 28, 2023, the shared laundry dryer lint is not being cleaned out and it
is full of dog hair.
12. The N5 notice also claims $500.00 from the Tenant in order to void the notice for the
damage to the hallway wall.
13. In Ball v Metro Capital Management Inc. [2002] OJ No 5931 (Div Crt)] the Divisional Court
considered subsection 43(2) of the Act and found that the purposes of requiring that a
landlord provide reasons and details on a notice given pursuant to the Act was to: (a) allow
the tenant to be in a position to know the case to be met before the Board; (b) allow the
tenant to decide whether or not to dispute the allegations made by the landlord; and, in the
case of a voidable notice, (c) allow the tenant to stop the conduct or activity or correct the
omission. The Divisional Court found that, to be in compliance with subsection 43(2), a
notice should include dates and times of the alleged conduct, together with a detailed
description of the alleged conduct. [Ball v Metro Capital Management Inc. [2002] OJ No
5931 (Div Crt), paras 10 and 12.]
14. The N5 notice served on the Tenant contains no times the alleged conduct occurred. I
found the Tenant, based on the N5 notice, could not know the case to be met or effectively
dispute the allegations made by the Landlords. The instructions on the N5 notice clearly
direct the Landlords to include the dates, times and specific details of the allegations. In my
view, it would not have been a difficult task for the Landlords to have included the times the
issues occurred. As a result, I found the N5 notice did not provide the Tenant sufficient
details of the allegations as required by section 43(2) of the Act and it was therefore
defective.
15. Additionally, the $500.00 the Landlords claimed for damage on the N5 notice went
unsubstantiated at the hearing. This amount was required to be paid by the Tenant in order
to void the notice. The Landlords’ evidence was that they “asked around” with a picture of
the damage. The Landlords submitted a picture of the damage and it shows a single area
of dented and damaged drywall. The Landlords submitted no estimates for the cost of the
repair. The Landlords evidence was the Tenant emailed them days before the hearing
stating he had obtained an estimate to repair the damage in the amount of $75.00 to
$100.00.
16. Since the Landlords provided no convincing evidence the damage to the drywall would
actually cost $500.00 to repair, I found the Tenant’s evidence on this point more reliable
and it was in line with what I consider to be a reasonable cost to repair the damage.
17. Because the amount given on the N5 notice to void the notice is substantially higher than
the amount that the repair will actually cost, I find this part of the N5 notice to be invalid as
Order Page: 3 of 7
File Number: LTB-L-020839-23
well. To find otherwise would be to allow landlords to inflate the cost of repairs on a
voidable N5 notice in order to render it non-voidable.
18. In the application, the Landlords also claims compensation for the cost to repair the
damage. Since the Tenant acknowledged he did cause the damage I find it fair to order he
2023 ONLTB 45850 (CanLII)
pay the reasonable costs to repair it. In my view, this amount is $100.00 based on the
Tenant’s own evidence and what I find to be reasonable after consideration of the
photograph submitted by the Landlords. This amount will be ordered.
Section 83 Considerations
19. The Landlords sought an eviction citing the significant financial impact the accumulating
rent arrears have had on them. They are a small Landlords and are currently paying their
own living costs as well as the mortgage on the rental property without the rental income
from the Tenant.
20. The Landlord, Ms.Diosi, testified they have given the Tenant reminders each month of the
rent arrears since the tenancy began in January 2023. They discussed a payment
agreement with the Tenant and contacted him through text messages and emails however
nothing materialized.
21. The Tenant testified he was evicted elsewhere before he moved into the rental unit. He had
been staying in hotels after this eviction but could no longer afford to. His evidence was he
paid first and last month’s rent to the Landlords but that the rental unit was over his budget.
22. The Tenant’s evidence was he is actively looking for work and that his current monthly
income is less than the monthly rent. His evidence was he is hopeful the Board, on an
unrelated application, will order his former landlord to pay him approximately $6,000.00.
He plans to use this money to pay the rent arrears.
23. The Tenant requested the Board order a payment plan. I did not find this was realistic as of
the day of the hearing, the Tenant’s monthly income could not support the monthly rent or
a meaningful payment towards the rent arrears.
24. The Tenant testified he has had issues with the rental unit including problems with the oven
and the time the shower’s hot water takes to be at a comfortable temperature. He also
mentioned there were other issues such as the floor not being level. I did not find any of
the issues articulated rose to the level of a serious breach of the Landlords’ obligations.
25. I asked the Tenant if there were any other circumstances he was experiencing that would
make an eviction unfair. The Tenant stated he had three dogs and would need
approximately eight weeks to find alternate living accommodations that would be suitable
in his circumstances.
26. I have considered all of the disclosed circumstances in accordance with subsection 83(2)
of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the 'Act'), including whether the Landlords
attempted to negotiate a repayment agreement with the Tenant and find that it would be
Order Page: 4 of 7
File Number: LTB-L-020839-23
unfair to grant relief from eviction pursuant to subsection 83(1) of the Act. The Tenant was
served the N4 notice in March of 2023 after moving into the unit in January 2023. His own
evidence was at the time he took possession, the unit was over his budget. I find the
Tenant has known from the outset of this tenancy that it was not sustainable and the
service of the N4 notice would have been a clear reminder of this. In my view, the Tenant
2023 ONLTB 45850 (CanLII)
has already had substantial time to prepare for the need to find alternative living
arrangements.
It is ordered that:
1. The tenancy between the Landlords and the Tenant is terminated unless the Tenant voids
this order.
2. The Tenant may void this order and continue the tenancy by paying to the Landlords
or to the LTB in trust:
• $6,686.00 if the payment is made on or before June 30, 2023. See Schedule 1 for
the calculation of the amount owing on the L1 application.
OR
• $8,286.00 if the payment is made on or before July 4, 2023. See Schedule 1 for the
calculation of the amount owing on the L1 application.
3. The Tenant may also make a motion at the LTB to void this order under section 74(11) of
the Act, if the Tenant has paid the full amount owing as ordered plus any additional rent
that became due after July 4, 2023 but before the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff)
enforces the eviction. The Tenant may only make this motion once during the tenancy.
4. If the Tenant does not pay the amount required to void this order the Tenant must
move out of the rental unit on or before July 4, 2023
5. If the Tenant does not void the order, the Tenant shall pay to the Landlords $4,205.41. This
amount includes rent arrears owing up to the date of the hearing and the cost of filing the
application. The rent deposit and interest the Landlords owe on the rent deposit are
deducted from the amount owing by the Tenant. See Schedule 1 for the calculation of the
amount owing on the L1 application.
6. The Tenant shall also pay the Landlords compensation of $52.60 per day for the use of the
unit starting June 15, 2023 until the date the Tenant moves out of the unit.
7. Pursuant to the L2 application, the Tenant shall also pay to the Landlords the amount of
$100.00 for the cost to repair the damage to the drywall.
8. If the Tenant does not pay the Landlords the full amount owing on or before July 4, 2023,
the Tenant will start to owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from July 5, 2023
at 6.00% annually on the balance outstanding.
Order Page: 5 of 7
File Number: LTB-L-020839-23
9. The Landlords or the Tenant shall pay to the other any sum of money that is owed as a
result of this order.
10. If the unit is not vacated on or before July 4, 2023, then starting July 5, 2023, the Landlords
may file this order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) so that the eviction may be
enforced.
2023 ONLTB 45850 (CanLII)
11. Upon receipt of this order, the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) is directed to give vacant
possession of the unit to the Landlords on or after July 5, 2023.
June 23, 2023 ____________________________
Date Issued John Cashmore
Member, Landlord and Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto
ON M7A 2G6
If you have any questions about this order, call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
In accordance with section 81 of the Act, the part of this order relating to the eviction expires on
January 5, 2024 if the order has not been filed on or before this date with the Court Enforcement
Office (Sheriff) that has territorial jurisdiction where the rental unit is located.
Order Page: 6 of 7
File Number: LTB-L-020839-23
Schedule 1
SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS
A. Amount the Tenant must pay to void the eviction order and continue the tenancy if
the payment is made on or before June 30, 2023
2023 ONLTB 45850 (CanLII)
Rent Owing To June 30, 2023 $7,400.00
Application Filing Fee $186.00
NSF Charges $0.00
Less the amount the Tenant paid to the Landlords since the - $900.00
application was filed
Total the Tenant must pay to continue the tenancy $6,686.00
B. Amount the Tenant must pay to void the eviction order and continue the tenancy if
the payment is made on or before July 4, 2023
Rent Owing To July 31, 2023 $9,000.00
Application Filing Fee $186.00
NSF Charges $0.00
Less the amount the Tenant paid to the Landlords since the - $900.00
application was filed
Total the Tenant must pay to continue the tenancy $8,286.00
C. Amount the Tenant must pay if the tenancy is terminated
Rent Owing To Hearing Date $6,536.40
Application Filing Fee $186.00
NSF Charges $0.00
Less the amount the Tenant paid to the Landlords since the - $900.00
application was filed
Less the amount of the last month's rent deposit - $1,600.00
Less the amount of the interest on the last month's rent deposit - $16.99
Total amount owing to the Landlords $4,205.41
Plus daily compensation owing for each day of occupation starting $52.60
June 15, 2023 (per day)
Order Page: 7 of 7