LTB Order LTB-L-026105-22
- Citation
- 2023 ONLTB 20609
- Decided
- 2023-02-22
- Rental unit
- 1 MARLBOROUGH ST BRAMPTON ON L6S2T3
- Landlord
- D.V.D.
- Tenant
- F.L.H.J.R.L.T.L.T.L.T.L.
- RTA section
- s. 69
Order under Section 69
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Citation: D. v L., 2023 ONLTB 20609
Date: 2023-02-22
2023 ONLTB 20609 (CanLII)
File Number: LTB-L-026105-22
In the matter of: 1 MARLBOROUGH ST
BRAMPTON ON L6S2T3
Between: D.V.D. Landlords
Sonia D.
And
F. L H.
J. R L.
T. L.
T. L.
T. L. Tenants
D.V.D. and Sonia D. and (the 'Landlords') applied for an order to terminate the
tenancy and evict F. L H., J. R L., T. L., T. L., Tryston
L., Tyler L. and T. L. because the Landlords in good faith require
possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation for at least one year.
The Landlords also claimed compensation for each day the Tenants remained in the unit after the
termination date.
This application was heard by videoconference on January 25, 2023.
The Landlords and two of the Tenants, F. H. and J. L., attended the hearing.
The application is amended to remove the name of two of the originally named Tenants, Tryston
L. and Tyler L., because they are minors. Throughout the rest of the order, the
term “Tenants” refers to the remaining five tenants named in the application.
Determinations:
1. As explained below, the Landlords have proven on a balance of probabilities the grounds
for termination of the tenancy in the application. Therefore, the tenancy is terminated
effective August 31, 2023.
2. The Tenants were in possession of the rental unit on the date the application was filed.
3. On May 4, 2022, the Landlords gave the Tenant an N12 notice of termination, deemed
served on May 9, 2022, with the termination date of July 14, 2022. The Landlords claim
that they require vacant possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential
Order Page 1 of 4
File Number: LTB-L-026105-22
occupation by one of them – D.V.D.. D. D. is one of the Landlords and he
is also the son of the other Landlord, Sonia D..
4. At the hearing, the Landlords testified that Mr. D. currently lives with his parents, and he
intends to move into the rental unit because he is turning 30 and he wants to start his own
2023 ONLTB 20609 (CanLII)
life. Mr. D. testified that he is getting married soon and he intends to live in the rental
unit with his partner for at least 4 – 5 years.
5. The Tenants challenged Mr. D.’s intention to move into the rental unit. They testified
that over the past few years, the Landlords have only expressed Mr. D.’s intention to
move into the rental unit during their discussions about renewing the tenancy agreement.
The Tenants testified that they had these discussions with Ms. D.’s husband. They
testified that each year, Ms. D.’s husband asked them to increase the rent. They
testified that they began pushing back against the rent increases in 2019 and that is when
Ms. D.’s husband began mentioning his son’s plan to move into the rental unit.
6. The Tenants testified that they also feel there is a connection between the Landlords
wanting to evict them and the Tenants’ refusal to sign a letter for their insurance company.
The Tenants testified that the Landlords asked them to sign a letter about their use of the
basement in the rental unit for insurance purposes, but the Tenants refused to do so and
this occurred in May 2022. The Tenants testified that a few days after they communicated
their refusal to the Landlords, they received the N12 notice of termination.
7. In reply, Mr. D. testified that he had no knowledge of his father’s conversations with the
Tenants about renewing the lease. He testified that he has been asking his parents to
move into the rental unit for the past several years. Ms. D. testified that her
understanding of the conversations between her husband and the Tenants was that each
year, her husband told the Tenants that their son was planning to move into the rental unit
and the Tenants responded by offering to pay more rent. She testified that the increased
rent was the result of the parties’ negotiations and mutual agreement. Ms. D. also
testified that she asked the Tenants to sign the letter for her insurance in May 2022
because her insurance company required it, but the Tenants’ refusal to do is not
connected to the Landlords’ service of the N12 notice.
8. On the balance of the evidence before me, I find that the Landlord, D. D., in good faith
requires possession of the rental unit for the purpose of his own residential occupation for
a period of at least one year.
9. Mr. D. was consistent and unwavering in his evidence that he intends to move into the
rental unit, and he has been planning to do so for several years. The parties do not dispute
that Ms. D.’s husband has also been mentioning his son’s intention to move into the
rental unit for several years. The fact that the Landlords postponed this plan and chose to
renew the tenancy agreement and increased the rent does not undermine Mr. D.’s
intention. There is insufficient evidence before me to conclude that the only reason the
Landlords served the N12 notice was either because the Tenants pushed back against the
rent increases or refused to sign the insurance letter.
10. The parties do not dispute that the Landlords compensated the Tenants an amount equal
to one month's rent by July 14, 2022.
Order Page 2 of 4
File Number: LTB-L-026105-22
11. The parties do not dispute that as of the hearing, the Tenant was up to date on his rent.
The rent is due on the 15th day of each month. Therefore, the daily compensation will
begin to run from February 15, 2023. Based on the Monthly rent, the daily compensation is
$82.19. This amount is calculated as follows: $2,500.00 x 12, divided by 365 days.
2023 ONLTB 20609 (CanLII)
12. There is no last month's rent deposit.
13. I have considered all of the disclosed circumstances in accordance with subsection 83(2)
of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the 'Act'), and find that it would not be unfair to
postpone the eviction until August 31, 2023 pursuant to subsection 83(1)(b) of the Act. The
Tenants testified that if the application is granted, they would need a year to move out. The
Tenants have been living in the rental unit since July 2017. They live in the rental unit with
their five children who range in age from 10 – 26 years old. Their children attend school or
work close to the rental unit. They attend a nearby church. Their children are involved in
the community. On the other hand, the Landlord, Mr. D., testified that he is prepared to
move into the rental unit right away. However, Mr. D.’s evidence does not establish that
he has an urgent need to move into the rental unit. He currently has a place to live that is
close to the rental unit and his work. Therefore, I find it appropriate to postpone eviction by
six months, which represents a compromise between the Landlord’s request for immediate
eviction and the Tenants’ request for a year. This will give the Tenants time to find another
place to live.
It is ordered that:
1. The tenancy between the Landlords and the Tenants is terminated. The Tenants must
move out of the rental unit on or before August 31, 2023.
2. If the unit is not vacated on or before August 31, 2023, then starting September 1, 2023,
the Landlords may file this order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) so that the
eviction may be enforced.
3. Upon receipt of this order, the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) is directed to give vacant
possession of the unit to the Landlords on or after September 1, 2023.
4. The Tenants shall also pay the Landlords compensation of $82.19 per day for the use of
the unit starting February 15, 2023 until the date the Tenants move out of the unit.
February 22, 2023
Date Issued Anna Solomon
Vice Chair, Landlord and Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor,
Toronto ON M7A 2G6
If you have any questions about this order, call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
In accordance with section 81 of the Act, the part of this order relating to the eviction of the
Order Page 3 of 4
File Number: LTB-L-026105-22
Tenant expires on March 1, 2024 if the order has not been filed on or before this date with the
Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) that has territorial jurisdiction where the rental unit is located.
2023 ONLTB 20609 (CanLII)
Order Page 4 of 4