LTB Order LTB-L-028014-23
- Citation
- 2023 ONLTB 41361
- Decided
- 2023-06-06
- Rental unit
- 2009 Bushmill Street North Pickering Ontario L1X1C8
- Landlord
- J.O.
- Tenant
- C.P.A.Y.P.
- RTA section
- s. 77(8)
Order under Section 77(8)
2023 ONLTB 41361 (CanLII)
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Citation: J.O. v Y. P., 2023 ONLTB 41361
Date: 2023-06-06
File Number: LTB-L-028014-23-SA
In the matter of: 2009 Bushmill Street North Pickering
Ontario L1X1C8
Between: J.O. Landlord
A.
C.P.A.Y.P. Tenants
J.O. (the 'Landlord') applied for an order to terminate the tenancy A. evict C.
P. A. Y. P. (the 'Tenants') because the Tenant entered into an agreement to
terminate the tenancy.
The Landlord's application was resolved by order LTB-L-028014-23, issued on April 26, 2023. This
order was issued without a hearing being held.
The Tenant filed a motion to set aside order LTB-L-028014-23 on April 27, 2023.
The motion was heard by videoconference on May 23, 2023 at 09:00 am.
The Landlord Representative Maria Rayson A. the Tenant Y. P. attended the hearing.
Determinations:
1. On March 23, 2023 the Landlord A. Tenant entered into an agreement to terminate the
tenancy as of April 16, 2023. The Tenant acknowledges that they have not vacated the
rental unit as required by the agreement.
2. After considering all of the circumstances, A. for the reasons that follow, I find that it
would be unfair to set aside order LTB-L-028014-23.
3. The Tenant testified that they had been trying to find a new rental property A. had hired
a real estate agent to assist them, but to date had no success as they were trying to limit
their search so that they wouldn’t have to change their children’s school. They also testified
that they were experiencing some financial hardship A. that they would like a delay to
sort out their finances. It was also their testimony that a delay to the end of June would
allow their children to finish out the school year without disruption.
4. In response the Landlord Representative submitted that to grant the Tenant’s motion would
be prejudicial to the Landlord. It was their uncontested submission that the Tenant hadn’t
paid rent in over four months A. the arrears were more than $9,000.00.
2023 ONLTB 41361 (CanLII)
Order Page 1 of 2
File Number: LTB-L-028014-23-SA
Accordingly, any further delay would add to the already existent financial hardship faced by
the Landlord.
5. Having considered the above testimony A. circumstances I am satisfied that it would be
unfair to set aside the order as requested given the Tenant hasn’t paid the rent in four
months, A. the current amount of arrears outstanding. I am in agreement with the
Landlord Representative that to grant the Tenants motion would be prejudicial to the
Landlord. Therefore, I must deny the Tenant’s motion.
It is ordered that:
1. The motion to set aside Order LTB-L-028014-23, issued on April 26, 2023 , is denied.
2. The stay of Order LTB-L-028014-23, is lifted immediately.
June 6, 2023 ____________________________ Date Issued
Kelly Delaney
Member, Landlord A. Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto
ON M7A 2G6
If you have any questions about this order, call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
Order Page 2 of 2
2023 ONLTB 41361 (CanLII)