LTB Order LTB-L-067829-23
- Citation
- 2023 ONLTB 75906
- Decided
- 2023-11-17
- Rental unit
- 234 CONCESSION 10 TOWNSEND ROAD WATERFORD ON N0E1Y0
- Landlord
- H.M.
- Tenant
- B.C.A.D.K.G.
- RTA section
- s. 78(11)
File Number: LTB-L-067829-23-SA
2023 ONLTB 75906 (CanLII)
Order under Section 78(11)
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Citation: M. v C., 2023 ONLTB 75906
Date: 2023-11-17
File Number: LTB-L-067829-23-SA
In the matter of: 234 CONCESSION 10 TOWNSEND ROAD
WATERFORD ON N0E1Y0
Between: H.M. Landlord
A.
B.C.A.D.K.G. Tenant
H.M. (the 'Landlord') applied for an order to terminate the tenancy A. evict B.
C. A. D. K. G. (the 'Tenant').
The Landlord's application was resolved by order LTB-L-067829-23, issued on September 19,
2023. This order was issued without a hearing being held.
The Tenant filed a motion to set aside order LTB-L-067829-23.
The motion was heard by videoconference on November 8, 2023.
The Landlord, the Landlord’s legal representative Courtney Boyd, the second named Tenant A.
their legal representative Kurt Shmuir attended the hearing. D. K. G. confirmed he has
authorization to speak on behalf of B. C..
Determinations:
Preliminary Issue
Order Page 1 of 4
File Number: LTB-L-067829-23-SA
1. At the hearing, the Landlord states there were multiple L4 applications filed with the Board
for various breaches of the original order. LTB-L-059692-23 was an L4 applications sent to
2023 ONLTB 75906 (CanLII)
hearing on September 27, 2023. At that hearing, the Member determined that due to the
timing of the filing of that L4 application A. the resolution from the matter now before the
Board, the previous L4 application was dismissed having regard for the doctrine of issue
estoppel.
The Breach
2. This motion is before the Board because the Landlord has obtained an ex parte eviction
order based on the allegation that the Tenants breached a Board order dated July 20,
2023. The Tenants do not want to be evicted A. asks the Board to set aside the eviction
order.
File Number: LTB-L-067829-23-SA
3. Pursuant to subsection 78(11) of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the 'Act') the issues
on a set aside motion like this one are:
• Did the Tenants breach the conditional order? If the answer to that question is no,
then the motion must be granted A. the eviction order set aside.
• If the Tenants did breach the conditional order, is the Board satisfied, having regard
to all the circumstances, that it would not be unfair to set aside the eviction order? If the
Board determines it would not be unfair to set aside the eviction order, the motion must be
granted A. the eviction order set aside. Pursuant to subsection 78(12) the Board may
then amend the previous mediated agreement if that would appropriate.
4. There is no dispute between the parties that the Tenants breached the July 20, 2023 order
as alleged by the Landlord, by failing to pay $250.00 toward storage by August 15, 2023.
That means, the next issue to be determined is whether or not it would be unfair in all the
circumstances to set aside the eviction order.
5. After considering all of the circumstances, I find that it would be unfair to set aside order
LTB-L-067829-23.
The Circumstances
Order Page 2 of 4
File Number: LTB-L-067829-23-SA
6. The tenancy began around April 1, 2017. The rental unit is a single family home on
commercial farmland property.
2023 ONLTB 75906 (CanLII)
7. The Tenants claim financial hardship as the reason for the breach. The Tenant said that he
was laid off work around July 2023 with significant delay in receiving his EI benefits. At that
time, B. C. was a student with no guaranteed income. The Tenant said he was
indebted to family A. friends A. chose to pay those debts instead of the debts to the
Landlord.
8. The Tenant said that he was in a motorcycle accident around October 24, 2023 A. is
partially incapacitated A. has not been able to meet all the conditions of the original
conditional order. He said he believes they are back on track A. will be able to make all
payments to the Landlord A. comply with the terms of the order. The Tenants ask that the
order be set aside but in the event the Board denies the Tenants’ motion, they seek a
minimum of 60 days to find alternative accommodations.
9. The Landlord opposes the Tenants’ motion stating the Tenants have failed to meet the
majority of the terms in the original order including, proof of insurance, provision of keys,
issues with the firepit A. impeding the Landlord’s access to the property.
10. The Landlord’s disclosure included several photographs A. various documents.
11. Although this order does not specifically address each piece of evidence individually or
reference all of the testimony, I have considered all of the evidence A. oral testimony
when making my determination
12. It is the position of the Landlord that the Tenants have failed to meet most of the terms of
the original order with blatant disregard. The continued breaches have a negative impact
on the daily operation of the farm A. the Tenants consciously chose to pay debts to
friends A. family over the Landlord. The Landlord asks the Board to deny the Tenants’
motion.
13. Given all of the above, I am not satisfied that it would not be unfair to set aside the eviction
order. As a result, the motion must be denied.
Lifting of the Stay
14. The Tenants ask that the lifting of the stay be delayed. He said they have 3 minor children
A. due to the accident, has limited mobility.
Order Page 3 of 4
File Number: LTB-L-067829-23-SA
15. The Landlord seeks an immediate lifting of the stay, claiming the Tenant has been seen
2023 ONLTB 75906 (CanLII)
moving around the property A. should be able to prepare to move with limited difficulty.
The Landlord believes the minor children do not reside at the property on a full time basis.
16. Based on the submissions of the parties, A. after considering all of the circumstances, I
find that it would not be unfair to delay lifting the stay December 15, 2023 to allow the
Tenants sufficient time to find a new place to live. I am granting this extra delay in
recognition of the Tenants’ limited financial resources A. the physical limitations.
17. This order contains all of the reasons for the decision within it. No further reasons shall be
issued.
It is ordered that:
1. The motion to set aside Order LTB-L-067829-23, issued on July 20, 2023, is denied.
2. The stay of Order LTB-L-067829-23, is lifted December 15, 2023.
3. Order LTB-L-067829-23 is unchanged.
November 17, 2023 ____________________________
Date Issued Dana Wren
Member, Landlord A. Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto
ON M7A 2G6
If you have any questions about this order, call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
Order Page 4 of 4