LTB Order LTB-L-069491-25
- Citation
- 2026 ONLTB 13414
- Decided
- 2026-02-09
- Rental unit
- 93 HASKINS CRES KESWICK ON L4P0H5 FEB 9 2026 Between: Eleonora Bibolli Landlord
- Landlord
- E.B.
- Tenant
- the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 Citation: Bibolli v Stewart, 2026 ONLTB 13414 Date: 2026-02-09 File Number: LTB-L-06
- RTA section
- s. 21.2
Order under Section 21.2
of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act
and the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Citation: B. v Stewart, 2026 ONLTB 13414
Date: 2026-02-09
File Number: LTB-L-069491-25-RV
In the matter of: 93 HASKINS CRES
KESWICK ON L4P0H5
FEB 9 2026
Between: E.B. Landlord
And
Amanda Stewart Tenant
Review Order
E.B. (the 'Landlord') applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Amanda
Stewart (the 'Tenant') because the Tenant did not pay the rent that the Tenant owes.
This application was resolved by order LTB-L-069491-25 issued on November 3, 2025.
On December 3, 2025, the Landlord requested a review of the order and that the order be stayed
until the request to review the order is resolved.
On interim order LTB-L-069491-25-RV-IN was issued, staying the order issued on November 3,
2025.
This application was heard by videoconference on December 18, 2025.
Only the Landlord’s Legal Representative Vasiola B. attended the hearing.
I was satisfied that the Tenant had received the Notice of Hearing and there was no request to
adjourn before me. Based on this, I proceeded to hear the review at 9:39 am.
Determinations:
1. The Landlord’s application had been summarily dismissed by the Presiding Member due to
the notice of termination issued to the Tenant not including the word “basement” in the
address.
2. The Landlord’s Legal Representative submitted that the Presiding Member erred when
they had raised the issue of the address unprompted by either party. Both parties provided
submissions however, the Presiding Member seemingly asked the Tenant question in an
Order Page 1 of 4
File Number: LTB-L-069491-25-RV
effort to support their position that the notice of hearing was defective as s. 43(1)(a)
outlines that a notice shall identify the rental unit for which the notice is given.
3. The Presiding Member never asked if anyone else was living in the unit and never asked
whether or not the Tenant had a separate mailbox for their basement unit.
4. Section 212(2) of the Act states that an error in the contents of a notice still constitutes
substantial compliance with the Act, so long as the error does not prejudice a party’s ability
to participate in a proceeding. This section was not considered by the Presiding Member to
confirm what, if any prejudice the Tenant may have experienced as a result of the error.
5. As such, On the basis of the uncontested submissions made in the request, I am satisfied
that there is a serious error in the order or that a serious error occurred in the proceedings.
6. As the Tenant had already vacated the unit, the matter proceeded to a de novo hearing.
De Novo Hearing
7. The Landlord served the Tenant with a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Non-payment
of Rent (N4 Notice). The Tenant did not void the notice by paying the amount of rent
arrears owing by the termination date in the N4 Notice or before the date the application
was filed.
8. The Tenant was in possession of the rental unit on the date the application was filed.
9. The Tenant vacated the rental unit on November 30, 2025. Rent arrears are calculated up
to the date the Tenant vacated the unit
10. The lawful rent is $2,150.00. It was due on the 1st day of each month.
11. The Tenant has not made any payments since the application was filed.
12. The rent arrears owing to November 30, 2025, are $8,600.00.
13. The Landlord incurred costs of $260.15 for filing the application and is entitled to
reimbursement of those costs.
14. The Landlord collected a rent deposit of $1,730.00 from the Tenant and this deposit is still
being held by the Landlord. The rent deposit is applied to the arrears of rent because the
tenancy terminated.
15. Interest on the rent deposit, in the amount of $35.43 is owing to the Tenant for the period
from February 5, 2025, to November 30, 2025.
It is ordered that:
1. The request to review order LTB-L-069491-25 issued on November 3, 2025, is granted.
2. The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated as of November 30, 2025,
the date the Tenant moved out of the rental unit.
Order Page 2 of 4
File Number: LTB-L-069491-25-RV
3. The Tenant shall pay to the Landlord $7,094.72. This amount includes rent arrears owing
up to the date the Tenant moved out of the rental unit and the cost of filing the application.
The rent deposit and interest the Landlord owes on the rent deposit is deducted from the
amount owing by the Tenant. See Schedule 1 for the calculation of the amount owing.
4. If the Tenant does not pay the Landlord the full amount owing on or before February 20,
2026, the Tenant will start to owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from
February 21, 2026, at 4.00% annually on the balance outstanding.
February 9, 2026 ____________________________
Date Issued Jagger Benham
Member, Landlord and Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor
Toronto ON M7A 2G6
If you have any questions about this order, call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
Order Page 3 of 4
File Number: LTB-L-069491-25-RV
Schedule 1
SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS
A. Amount the Tenant must pay as the tenancy is terminated
Rent Owing To Move Out Date $8,600.00
Application Filing Fee $260.15
Less the amount of the last month's rent deposit - $1,730.00
Less the amount of the interest on the last month's rent deposit - $35.43
Total amount owing to the Landlord $7,094.72
Order Page 4 of 4