LTB Order LTB-T-007961-22
- Citation
- 2023 ONLTB 20809
- Decided
- 2023-05-15
- Rental unit
- Main, 263 Wright Avenue Toronto Ontario M6R1L7
- Landlord
- P.N.A.V.D.T.A.L.H.L.
- Tenant
- V.D.
- RTA section
- s. 31
2023 ONLTB 20809 (CanLII)
Order under Section 31
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Citation: D. v L., 2023 ONLTB 20809
Date: 2023-05-15
File Number: LTB-T-007961-22
In the matter of: Main, 263 Wright Avenue Toronto
Ontario M6R1L7
Between: P. N. A. V. D. T.
A.
Li H. L. Landlord
P. N. A. V. D. (the 'T.') applied for an order determining that Li H. L.
(the 'Landlord') harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant; entered
the rental unit illegally; A. substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit
or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of the Tenant's household (T2 application).
The T. also applied for an order determining that the Landlord failed to meet the Landlord's
maintenance obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the 'Act') or failed to comply
with health, safety, housing or maintenance standards. (T6 application).
This application was heard by videoconference on February 9, 2023. Only the Tenant V.
D. attended the hearing. As of 9:55 am, the Landlord was not present or represented at the
hearing although properly served with notice of this hearing by the LTB. There was no record of a
request to adjourn the hearing. As a result, the hearing proceeded with only the T.’ evidence.
Determinations:
1. The application was filed on November 15, 2021.
2. The T. moved into the unit on December 1, 2020 A. they moved out of the unit on
December 5, 2021.
3. At the commencement of the hearing, the Tenant requested to withdraw the T6 application.
In accordance with subsection 200(4) of the Act, I consent to the withdrawal of the T.’
T6 application.
Order Page: 1 of 5
File Number: LTB-T-007961-22
4. In the T2 application, the T. allege that the Landlord entered their unit illegally,
harassed A. interfered with the T. due to work taking place on the property.
5. As explained below, the T. have proven on a balance of probabilities that the Landlord
2023 ONLTB 20809 (CanLII)
entered the unit illegally A. interfered with the T.’ reasonable enjoyment of the
complex by obstructing the access of their parking space. The Landlord is therefore ordered
to pay the T. $240.87 inclusive of costs.
The Tenant’s Evidence A. Submissions
6. The Tenant testified that they moved into the unit on December 1, 2020. They rented the
main unit of the rental complex, which has a total of 4 units. She testified that the T.’
rental agreement included exclusive use of the front A. back yard. She testified that the
Landlord frequently attended the property without notice to conduct maintenance A.
various duties around the property. She testified that the Landlord was doing exterior work
in close proximity to their bedroom A. living room windows on several occasions without
giving any notice.
7. The Tenant testified that on August 8, 2021, the Landlord was seen painting the window sills
of their unit around 5-6 pm. She took a photo of the Landlord A. emailed it to the Landlord
asking that notice be given for such work to be conducted in close proximity to their unit. She
testified that the Landlord did not respond to the email.
8. The Tenant testified that on October 28, 2021, heavy equipment was outside of their unit at
8 am, moving dirt outside of the T.’ bedroom window.
9. The Tenant testified that on November 11, 2021, the Landlord was doing work outside of the
living room window of their unit. She emailed a photo of the Landlord in front of the window,
A. requested that the Landlord provide notice of plans to do maintenance near the T.’
windows. The Landlord replied to the Tenant. The Landlord’s response was apologetic,
explaining that the Landlord believed she was not required to give notice for work being done
on the exterior of the property. The Landlord acknowledged that she would give notice in
future.
10. The Tenant testified that the Landlord had soil delivered to the property on October 23, 2021.
The parties had been in communication by email regarding the soil delivery A. the fact that
it would be deposited on the driveway A. moved within a few hours. The T. take issue
with the fact that the soil did not get moved for one week from the driveway, which let to their
parking spot being inaccessible. Further, they suffered stress A. inconvenience from the
soil that turned to mud as a result of rainfall. The email communications demonstrate that
the Landlord did not intend to leave the soil on the driveway. The work was impeded by
significant rainfall. The Tenant testified that she had to park her vehicle on the street for
approximately one week A. incurred a fee for this. She requested her parking fees to be
deducted from her rent, which the Landlord refused. She testified that over the next month
their yard was not usable as all of the soil was eventually moved to the lawns A. turned to
Order Page: 2 of 5
File Number: LTB-T-007961-22
mud, which impacted the T.’ ability to have use A. enjoyment of their front A. back
yards from October 23, 2021 through November 30, 2021.
11. The Tenant testified that generally, communications with the Landlord were not good. She
2023 ONLTB 20809 (CanLII)
testified that every couple of weeks the Landlord contacted them about something A. it
created a level of stress A. anxiety for the T. who did not want to hear from the
Landlord so frequently. She testified that she eventually muted the Landlord’s messages to
maintain a peaceful environment.
12. The Tenant testified that the Landlord refused to provide proof of permits for construction
taking place in the complex A. this interfered with the T.’ enjoyment of the unit
because they were unsure if the construction was in accordance with property standards
A. the provincial building code. An email exchange on June 12 A. 13, 2021 was entered
into evidence where the Landlord explained the move of laundry machines A. advised the
T. that her contractor was taking care of everything pertaining to the construction.
13. The T. seek $100.00 for each alleged illegal entry ($300.00) A. a 25% rent abatement
for the months of October A. November 2021 for the inconvenience they incurred related
to the mud on the rental property, general stress A. anxiety from the Landlord’s refusal to
give proper notice of attendance at the property, excessive communications A. refusal to
provide particulars of a construction project at the rental complex.
Analysis:
Illegal Entry
14. Section 27 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the Act) states.
27 (1) A landlord may enter a rental unit in accordance with written notice given to the
tenant at least 24 hours before the time of entry under the following circumstances:
1. To carry out a repair or replacement or do work in the rental unit
2. To allow a potential mortgagee or insurer of the residential complex to view the rental
unit.
3. To allow a person who holds a certificate of authorization within the meaning of the
Professional Engineers Act or a certificate of practice within the meaning of the
Architects Act or another qualified person to make a physical inspection of the rental
unit to satisfy a requirement imposed under subsection 9 (4) of the Condominium Act,
1998.
4. To carry out an inspection of the rental unit, if,
Order Page: 3 of 5
File Number: LTB-T-007961-22
i. the inspection is for the purpose of determining whether or not the rental unit is in
a good state of repair A. fit for habitation A. complies with health, safety, housing
A. maintenance standards, consistent with the landlord’s obligations under
subsection 20 (1) or section 161, A.
2023 ONLTB 20809 (CanLII)
ii. it is reasonable to carry out the inspection.
5. For any other reasonable reason for entry specified in the tenancy agreement.
15. Based on the evidence before the Board, I am satisfied that the Landlord illegally entered
the rental unit on August 8, 2021, October 28, 2021 A. November 11, 2021. The Act
specifies that notice must be given if repair or replacement takes place in the rental unit. In
this case, the Landlord A./or her contractors conducted at the exterior of the rental property,
namely exterior foundation work as attested by the Tenant. The Tenant testified that both
the front A. back yard are for the exclusive use of the T. A. therefore, I find that the
exterior arears surrounding the unit are included as part of the rental unit . As such, entering
the front or back yard requires the Landlord to serve notice upon the T., failing which,
the entry constitutes illegal entry of the T.’ unit.
16. I find that the Tenant raised the issue with the Landlord about the need for notice on two
occasions, the latter of which, the Landlord expressed her regrets, explained that it was a
misunderstanding A. confirmed that she would provide notice in future. The Tenant led no
specific evidence about any impact felt by the T. for the 3 illegal entries, beyond
general frustration that the Landlord failed to give notice. Therefore, I find that an award of
$150.00 for the 3 illegal entries is appropriate in the circumstance A. sufficient to encourage
the Landlord’s compliance with the Act.
Harassment A. Interference
17. Sections 22 A. 23 of the Act states.
(3) A landlord shall not at any time during a tenant’s occupancy of a rental unit A. before
the day on which an order evicting the tenant is executed substantially interfere with the
reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or the residential complex in which it is located
for all usual purposes by a tenant or members of his or her household.
(4) A landlord shall not harass, obstruct, coerce, threaten or interfere with a tenant
18. Based on the evidence before the Board, I find that the Landlord substantially interfered with
the T.’ reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit by leaving a large dirt pile on the
driveway which obstructed access to the T.’ parking spot for approximately one week.
This caused the T. to incur charges for street parking which the Landlord refused to
reimburse. The T. incurred fees totaling $37.87 for a one-week parking pass on
October 23, 2021 A. are entitled to reimbursement of this cost. There were no submissions
regarding any inconvenience of parking on the street.
Order Page: 4 of 5
File Number: LTB-T-007961-22
19. I find that the Landlord gave notice of the delivery of soil to the property A. the T.
acknowledged. The evidence demonstrates that the Landlord intended to have the soil
delivered A. moved quickly. However, due to significant rainfall, the soil was not moved
2023 ONLTB 20809 (CanLII)
for several days. I am not satisfied that the presence of the soil interfered with the T.’
enjoyment of the unit or the rental complex. The photos adduced into evidence did not clearly
depict the complaints raised by the T.. There were no photos to demonstrate that the
front or back yards were covered in mud. The claim regarding a loss of enjoyment of the
unit due to the soil left at the rental property on October 23, 2021 is therefore dismissed.
20. I find that the Landlord responded reasonably to the T.’ inquiries about construction at
the rental complex A. the movement of laundry amenities. I do not find that the Landlord
was obligated to produce permits or other documents related to the planning A. execution
of construction taking place at the complex. Therefore, I do not find that this allegation
constitutes interference with the T.’ enjoyment. This portion of the T.’ claim is
dismissed.
21. There was no evidence submitted to support that the Landlord harassed the T. with a
barrage of communications A. therefore, this portion of the T.’ claim is dismissed.
It is ordered that:
1. The Landlord shall pay to the T. $37.87 which represents the out-of-pocket expenses
incurred for street parking A. $150.00 for illegal entries to the T.’ unit.
2. The Landlord shall also pay the T. $53.00 for the cost of filing the application.
3. The total amount the Landlord owes is $240.87.
4. The Landlord shall pay the T. the full amount owing by May 26, 2023.
.
5. If the Landlord does not pay the T. the full amount owing by May 26, 2023, they will
owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from May 27, 2023 at 6.00% annually on
the balance outstanding.
May 15, 2023 ____________________________
Date Issued Donna Adams
Member, Landlord A. Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor St, Ground Floor Toronto
ON M7A 2G6
If you have any questions about this order, call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
Order Page: 5 of 5