LTB Order LTB-T-071933-22
- Citation
- 2023 ONLTB 77633
- Decided
- 2023-11-28
- Rental unit
- 1929 Pine Grove Avenue Pickering Ontario L1V6R4 Tenants Between: Ganesh Arunagi Rinathan Nicole Maharaj
- Landlord
- G.A.R.N.M.A.
- Tenant
- L.P.H.G.A.R.A.N.M.T.T.A.F.A.O.D.T.P.
O. under Subsection 135
2023 ONLTB 77633 (CanLII)
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Citation: A. R. v H., 2023 ONLTB 77633
Date: 2023-11-28
File Number: LTB-T-071933-22
In the matter of: 1929 Pine Grove Avenue
Pickering Ontario L1V6R4
Tenants
Between: G. A. R.
N. M.
A.
L.
P. H.
G. A. R. A. N. M. (the 'Tenants') A. F. an O. D. T.
P. H. (the 'L.') collected or retained money illegally.
This application was heard by videoconference on November 20, 2023.
The L. A. the Tenants attended the hearing.
Determinations:
1. As explained below, the Tenants proved the allegations contained in the application on a
balance of probabilities. Therefore, the L. must pay the Tenant the amount collected
F. deposit as detailed below.
2. The Tenants’ T1 application is about money collected A. retained F. keys to the house,
mailbox A. garage door opener.
3. It was not disputed T. the tenancy began November 28, 2017 A. the Tenants moved out
November 17, 2020.
4. There is no dispute T. around October 27, 2017, the L. collected $300.00 as
deposit F. the keys A. garage door opener.
5. I note, the OREA agreement specifies, at Schedule A, T. this deposit is refundable A.
will be returned to the Tenants upon return of possessions in good working O..
6. The Tenants said T. during the move-out inspection with the L.’s husband on
November 18, 2020, the keys A. opener were turned over A. the L.’s husband
confirmed everything was acceptable A. T. he would be in touch to return the deposit.
O. Page 1 of 3
2023 ONLTB 77633 (CanLII)
File Number: LTB-T-071933-22
7. The Tenants said they followed up with the L. a short time later A. they were
advised T. due to damage to the refrigerator, the deposit would not be returned.
8. The Tenants read into the record a text message from the L. to the Tenants around
December 1, 2020 where the Tenants were advised T. the deposit would be returned
once the Tenants paid the water bill.
9. The L. opposes the Tenants’ application A. says there was no move out inspection
A. only the mailbox key was left in the garage, no house keys A. the garage door
opener was damaged. The L. did not provide any submissions on the cost to repair
the remote nor costs associated with replacement keys. The L. said her husband did
not meet with the Tenants. I note, he was not available to provide testimony on the date of
the hearing.
10. The L. said T. there was significant damage in the rental unit following the
terminate of the tenancy.
11. As discussed at the hearing, a deposit is not intended to be used to cover costs as claimed
by the L..
Law A. Analysis
12. Subsection 134(1) of the Act says:
134. (1) Unless otherwise prescribed, no L. shall, directly or indirectly, with respect
to any rental unit,
(a) collect or require or attempt to collect or require from a tenant or prospective tenant of
the rental unit a fee, premium, commission, bonus, penalty, key deposit or other like
amount of money whether or not the money is refundable;
13. This reads as an absolute prohibition against a L. charging any kind of fee other than
rent to a tenant. However, the section uses the phrase “unless otherwise prescribed” which
means fees can be charged if they are set out in regulation.
14. The exemptions to s. 134(1) are set out in section 17 of Ontario Regulation 516/06. It says
in part:
17. The following payments are exempt from section 134 of the Act:
1. Payment F. additional keys, remote entry devices or cards requested by the
2023 ONLTB 77633 (CanLII)
tenant, not greater than the direct costs.
2. Payment F. replacement keys, remote entry devices or cards, not greater than the
direct replacement costs, unless the replacement keys, remote entry devices or cards are
required because the L., on the L.’s initiative, changed the locks.
3. Payment of a refundable key, remote entry device or card deposit, not greater than
the expected direct replacement costs.
.
File Number: LTB-T-071933-22
[Emphasis added.]
15. Based on the evidence before the Board A. on a balance of probabilities I find the
Tenants returned the keys A. garage door opener to the L.’s husband during the
move out inspection. I find it more likely than not, T. the L. chose to retain the
deposit based on the allegations of damage in the rental unit. I am satisfied T. the
L. collected A. retained the key A. garage door deposit in the amount of $300.00
illegally.
16. Pursuant to s.134 of the Act A. s.17 of the O.Reg. 516/06, the L. must return the
$300.00 key deposit she continues to retain. Even if the deposit was initially collected
legally pursuant to s.17 of the regulations, the deposit must be refundable A. it should
have been returned to the Tenants when they moved out on November 17, 2020.
17. The Tenants incurred costs of $53.00 F. filing the application A. is entitled to an O.
requiring the L. to reimburse them T. cost. An O. will issue accordingly.
It is ordered T.:
1. The L. shall pay to the Tenants the sum of $353.00. This amount represents:
o $300.00 F. the illegal charge collected.
o $53.00 F. the cost of filing the application.
2. The L. shall pay the Tenants the full amount owing by December 9, 2023.
3. If the L. does not pay the Tenants the full amount owing by December 9, 2023, the
L. will owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from December 10, 2023
at 7.00% annually on the balance outstanding.
4. The Tenants have the right, at any time, to collect the full amount owing or any balance
outstanding under this O..
2023 ONLTB 77633 (CanLII)
November 28, 2023 ____________________________
Date Issued Dana Wren
Member, L. A. Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto
ON M7A 2G6
If you have any questions about this O., call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
.