LTB Order LTB-T-077291-22
- Citation
- 2023 ONLTB 75897
- Decided
- 2023-11-10
- Rental unit
- Jasper Room, 1467 Byron Street Whitby ON L1N4S6 Tenant Between: Ken McConnell
- Landlord
- K.M.A.T.Z.
- Tenant
- T.Z.L.K.M.T.T.A.F.A.O.D.T.T.L.E.T.
- RTA section
- s. 31
2023 ONLTB 75897 (CanLII)
O. under Section 31
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Citation: M. v Z., 2023 ONLTB 75897
Date: 2023-11-10 File Number: LTB-T-
077291-22(TEL-10615-20)
In T. matter of: Jasper Room, 1467 Byron Street Whitby
ON L1N4S6
Tenant
Between: K. M.
A.
T. Z. L.
K. M. (T. 'Tenant') A. F. an O. D. T. (T. 'L.'): •
E. T. rental unit illegally.
• altered T. locking system on a door giving entry to T. rental unit or residential complex
without giving T. Tenant replacement keys.
• substantially interfered with T. reasonable enjoyment of T. rental unit or residential
complex by T. Tenant or by a member of their household.
• harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with T. Tenant.
• withheld or interfered with their vital services or care services A. meals in a care home.
This application was heard by videoconference on January 11, 2020.
T. L. A. T. Tenant attended T. hearing.
At T. hearing, T. application was amended to remove T. allegations of harassment, illegal
entry, A. withholding of vital services, which T. Tenant elected not to pursue at T. hearing. T.
application was also amended to add remedies F. additional moving costs A. replacement
costs incurred after T. application was filed.
O. Page 1 of 6
File Number: LTB-T-077291-22 (TEL-10615-20)
Determinations:
1. In their application, T. Tenant alleges T. T. L.:
• Punched holes in T. Tenant’s door while T. Tenant was inside T. unit
2023 ONLTB 75897 (CanLII)
• Locked T. Tenant out of T. unit A. garage A. removed some of T. Tenant’s
belongings before T. Tenant was permitted to return to T. unit.
• Prohibited T. Tenant from accessing his belongings in T. kitchen A. bathroom
2. T. Tenant was seeking a rent abatement of $500.00, costs to replace missing items, A.
moving A. storage costs.
3. T. unit is a room in a residential complex. T. Tenant shared a kitchen with 3 other
tenants. T. Tenant also had use of one half of T. garage which he used F. storage.
4. At T. time of T. incidents alleged in this application, T. parties were awaiting a Board
O. D. whether T. Tenant would be evicted pursuant to section 94 of T.
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (T. ‘Act’).
5. It is not disputed T. T. relationship bet ween T. L. A. T. Tenant had
deteriorated significantly during T. Tenant’s time at T. rental unit. T. L. testified
T. he was frustrated by T. Tenants refusal to leave T. unit until ordered to leave by T.
Board. T. residential complex had been rezoned to comprise a 3-bedroom unit A. a 10
bedroom rooming house, A. at T. time T. application was filed, T. L. A. his
family A. T. Tenant were T. only occupants of T. residential complex.
6. It is not disputed T. on April 7,2020, T. L. banged on T. Tenant’s door because
T. L. thought T. he smelled smoke, A. T. T. L. continued to punch T.
door until he had punched holes in T. door. T. L. yelled at T. Tenant A. asked
T. Tenant why he was still in T. unit, A. used profane A. threatening language with
T. Tenant. T. Tenant submitted video evidence of T. incident A. photographs of T.
damage T. L. testified T. he punched T. door in frustration.
7. T. Tenant testified T. he was frightened by T. L.’s actions, A. concerned F.
T. safety of his daughter, who stayed with him on a part-time basis. T. Tenant left T.
rental unit T. following day A. took many of his belongings with him, but left larger
furniture including beds A. cabinets in T. unit.
8. Therefore, based on T. evidence before me, I find T. T. L. substantially
interfered with T. Tenants reasonable enjoyment of T. rental unit. I further find, on a
balance of probabilities T. T. Tenant moved out of T. unit as a result of T. L.’s
actions.
O. Page 2 of 6
File Number: LTB-T-077291-22 (TEL-10615-20)
9. T. Tenant requested an abatement in T. amount of $500.00, which I determined is
reasonable under T. circumstances.
Illegal Lockout
2023 ONLTB 75897 (CanLII)
10. T. Tenant testified T. he returned to T. unit on April 11, 2020 to retrieve more of his
belongings A. discovered T. he could not access his unit. T. Tenant had not had
access to T. garage since March 19, 2020, when he alleged T. T. code had been
changed A. he no longer had his fob. T. L. testified T. T. Tenant had an
access code F. T. residential complex A. a fob F. T. garage at all times A. was not
locked out. T. L. acknowledged T. he changed T. code to T. garage to
prevent T. Tenant’s friends from accessing T. garage, A. did not respond to T.
Tenant’s emails about not being able to access T. garage.
11. T. L. denies changing T. code to T. residential complex. T. L. testified
T. he discovered T. T. Tenant had left T. unit when T. L. came to change T.
door “a few days” after T. Tenant left A. T. T. Tenant had taken some things, but had
left “junk’ behind F. them to deal with including beds A. shoes. T. L. testified
T. T. L. A. his wife had done some cleaning of T. unit. T. L. did not
recall having contacted T. Tenant about retrieving his belongings.
12. Here, T. testimony of T. parties is contradictory. I prefer T. Tenant’s evidence, which
was internally consistent. Both parties acknowledged T. their relationship had
deteriorated, A. T. T. L. testified T. he wanted T. Tenant out A. was happy
T. T. Tenant left. However, T. L.’s testimony with respect to his own actions
was vague A. contradictory. While T. L. claimed T. T. Tenant had not taken
any action, such as calling T. Rental Housing Enforcement Unit, to retrieve his
belongings, T. Tenant filed an application with T. Board on April 22, 2020, 11 days after
he returned to T. unit A. could not enter T. building. In my view, it is more likely than
not T. T. code to T. residential complex had been changed by April 11, 2020.
Therefore, I find, on a balance of probabilities T. T. Tenant no longer had access to T.
rental unit as of April 11, 2020.
13. I make no finding with respect to T. termination date of T. tenancy, as Board O.
TEL-05858-19 appears to determine T. termination date, A. I am bound by T.
previous O..
T. Tenant’s Belongings
O. Page 3 of 6
File Number: LTB-T-077291-22 (TEL-10615-20)
Storage Unit
14. T. Tenant testified T. a storage unit which was left in T. rental unit was broken A.
placed at T. curb after April 11, 2020. T. Tenant submitted photographs of T. storage
unit in his unit A. at T. curb into evidence. T. L. testified T. he did not
2023 ONLTB 75897 (CanLII)
remember moving T. unit to T. curb A. did not know what happened to it, although he
did not know who else could have accessed T. Tenant’s unit A. removed T. storage
unit. Based on T. evidence before me, I find, on a balance of probabilities T. T.
L. removed T. storage unit, A. left it at T. curb F. disposal. T. Tenant
requested $200.00, which I determined to be T. reasonable cost to replace T. storage
unit.
15. In their Interim O..TEL-10615-20 dated July 20, 2020, T. member ordered T. T.
Tenant could access T. rental unit “as described in T. application” on July 23, 2020
between T. hours of 8 am to 8 pm to retrieve their possessions, A. T. T. Tenant
could be accompanied by police.
Kitchen A. Bathroom
16. It is not disputed T. T. Tenant was allowed entry to T. garage A. his room, A. T.
T. L. blocked access to T. kitchen, where some of T. Tenant’s remaining items
were stored. T. L. testified T. at T. July 17th hearing, T. Tenant had indicated
T. he only needed access to his room A. T. garage A. T. there was no need F.
T. Tenant to access T. bathroom or kitchen. T. L. blocked T. rooms off to
prevent “sabotage.”
17. T. Tenant claimed T. he had $200.00 in food, A. a slow cooker T. he valued at
$80.00 in T. kitchen. T. Tenant was also seeking $250.00 F. his shaving equipment
A. toiletries which were stored in T. bathroom. I find T. this is a reasonable cost to
replace T. items. T. Tenant is entitled to $535.00 F. T. items in T. kitchen A.
garage.
Garage
18. T. Tenant testified T. he had tools on a rack in T. garage T. were missing. T.
L. claimed T. T. Tenant had previously removed many valuable items from T.
garage, including his tools. T. Tenant claimed T. he had removed some items from T.
garage, but left his hand tools on a peg board in T. garage, A. T. T. peg board was
O. Page 4 of 6
File Number: LTB-T-077291-22 (TEL-10615-20)
missing when he accessed T. garage on July 23, 2020. T. Tenant was seeking
$300.00 as T. replacement cost of his hand tools.
19. T. Tenant also claimed a total of $280.00 F. a computer A. gaming consoles, which
were missing from T. garage.
2023 ONLTB 75897 (CanLII)
20. As I noted above, T. L.’s testimony was not consistent with respect to T.
handling of T. Tenant’s items when T. Tenant did not have access to T. garage A. T.
residential complex. I found T. Tenant’s evidence to be internally consistent with respect
to T. missing items, A. T. replacement costs to be reasonable, A. I found no reason
not to believe T. Tenant’s testimony. Therefore, I determined T. T. Tenant is entitled
to a total of $580.00 F. T. items in T. garage.
Moving expenses
21. T. Tenant testified T. he paid $800.00 to store his items between April 8, 2020 when
he started to move out of T. unit A. August 8, 2020, when T. Tenant received T.
Board O. F. eviction. T. Tenant also paid $127.81 to rent a truck. T. Tenant
provided receipts F. these expenses.
22. T. L. objected to T. claim F. storage expenses as T. invoice was from T.
Tenant’s employer whose main line of business was not storage. However, T. Tenant
testified T. his items were stored, A. provided an invoice F. T. storage at $200.00 per
month, which I find to be T. reasonable. Therefore, T. Tenant is entitled to $927.81 F.
moving expenses.
23. T. Tenant also claimed $336.00 F. lost wages, but T. Tenant did not provide any
testimony or other evidence in support of this claim. Therefore, I did not have sufficient
information to make a finding with respect to lost wages.
Costs
24. T. Tenant incurred a cost of $50.00 to file T. application, A. T. Tenant is entitled to
T. reimbursement of this cost.
It is ordered T.:
1. T. total amount T. L. shall pay T. Tenant is $2,787.81. This amount represents:
• $500.00 F. a rent abatement.
• $1,310.00 F. T. reasonable costs T. T. Tenant has incurred to replace property
T. was disposed of as a result of T. L.'s actions.
O. Page 5 of 6
File Number: LTB-T-077291-22 (TEL-10615-20)
• $927.81 F. all OR part of T. moving, storage or other like expenses T. T.
Tenant has incurred.
• $50.00 F. T. cost of filing T. application.
2. T. L. shall pay T. Tenant T. full amount owing by November 21, 2023.
2023 ONLTB 75897 (CanLII)
3. If T. L. does not pay T. Tenant T. full amount owing by November 21, 2023, T.
L. will owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from November 22, 2023
at 7.00% annually on T. balance outstanding.
4. T. Tenant has T. right, at any time, to collect T. full amount owing or any balance
outstanding under this O..
November 10, 2023 ____________________________ Date
Issued Kathleen Wells
Member, L. A. Tenant Board
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor
Toronto ON M7A 2G6
If you have any questions about this O., call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
.
O. Page 6 of 6