LTB Order LTB-T-088912-24
- Rental unit
- 9 Glacier Cres Glacier Cres Scarborough ON M1X2A9
- Landlord
- D.T.T.N.K.F.A.H.Z.
- Tenant
- H.Z.L.D.T.A.N.K.T.T.A.F.A.O.D.T.H.
- RTA section
- s. 30
O. under Section 30
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
File Number: LTB-T-088912-24
In the matter of: 9 Glacier Cres Glacier Cres
Scarborough ON M1X2A9
Between: D. T. T.
N. K.
F. 23, 2026
A.
H. Z. L.
D. T. A. N. K. (the 'Tenants') A. F. an O. D. T.
H. Z. (the 'L.') failed to meet the L.'s maintenance obligations under the
Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the 'Act') or failed to comply with health, safety, housing or
maintenance standards.
This application was heard by videoconference on January 22, 2026 at 09:00 am.
The L. A. the Tenants attended the hearing.
Determinations:
1. As explained below, the T. proved on a balance of probabilities the following
allegations contained in the application.
2. The rental property consisted of a single-family home.
3. The Tenancy commenced on December 9, 2022 A. was terminated effective October 31,
2024 by Board O. LTB-L-038720-24 issued on September 24, 2024 with the Tenants
vacating January 5, 2025 in accordance with the Court Enforcement Officer’s O..
4. The lawful monthly rent was $3,300.00
5. It was the Tenants testimony T. at the commencement of the tenancy they noticed A.
informed the L. on December 19, 2022 T. the garage door was malfunctioning as
it would not close properly or lock. They supported this with pictures entered in evidence.
6. They then testified T. the L. never too any step s to correct the issue during the
tenancy A. as a result represented a security issue, necessitating additional locks on the
interior door A. allowed F. mice A. other vermin gained access to the garage,
O. Page 1 of 4
File Number: LTB-T-088912-24
damaging their property which they complained about on September 13, 2023. This was
supported by pictures of mice excrement A. their damaged property entered in evidence.
7. They then entered in evidence pictures purportedly taken after they moved out, claiming
the L. had waited until they vacated to address the issue with the garage door.
Remedies sought.
8. The Tenants testified they were seeking the following remedies:
a. An abatement of rent of $3,300.00;
b. Out of pocket expenses F. damaged property of $449.00; A.
c. The application filing fee $48.00
9. In response the L. testified T. they investigated upon receipt of the initial complaint
on December 19, 2022 A. determined T. the garage door did not represent a safety
issue A. having communicated T. received no further complaints until October 2024.
Again, they testified T. at T. time they determined there was no safety issue A.
subsequent to the Tenants moving out they received no complaints from their current
T.. They supported this with a text message from their current T. entered in
evidence
10. They then testified T. by T. time the tenancy had been terminated, T. the Tenants had
not been paying their rent A. they did not believe they had an obligation to act as the
Tenants had refused to move out in accordance with the Board O..
11. Having considered the above testimony, evidence, A. F. the reasons T. follow I find
T. the L. failed to meet the L.'s obligations under subsection 20(1) of the
Act to maintain the rental unit A. failed to comply with health safety, housing or
maintenance standards.
12. In Onyskiw v. CJM Property Management Ltd., 2016 ONCA 477, the Court of Appeal held
T. the LTB should take a contextual approach A. consider the entirety of the factual
situation in D. whether there was a breach of the L.'s maintenance
obligations, including whether the L. responded to the maintenance issue reasonably
in the circumstances. The court rejected the submission T. a L. is automatically in
breach of its maintenance obligation as soon as an interruption in service occurs.
13. In this case the L. admitted to being aware of the alleged issues, namely the garage
door, mice A. or rat infestation within the garage on or about October 2024. Further even
if I accepted their submission T. they investigated A. found no issue, or the text
message from their current T. which I do not given the Tenants pictures of mice or rat
excrement or very clear there was an issue A. the text amounts to hearsay, I cannot
overlook they testified they did not believe they had an obligation to act as the tenancy had
been terminated. This is not reasonable, A. a direct contravention of subsection 20 of the
Act.
O. Page 2 of 4
File Number: LTB-T-088912-24
14. Regardless of the fact T. the tenancy had been terminated, the L. had an
obligation to respond to issues A. maintain the rental unit up until the eviction was
enforced by the sheriff, as such I am satisfied the Tenants have proven their case A. are
entitled to the remedies sought.
15. T. said, given the Tenants failed prove the alleged issues were extant in September
2023, as the pictures had no date or time stamps, or T. the L. was aware at the
time due to an absence of correspondence verifying it was communicated, coupled with
the issue being confined to the garage, A. an absence of any receipts F. the damaged
property, this will affect the amount awarded.
Remedies
16. I find T. a rent abatement of $1,650.00 is appropriate in the circumstances, given, as
noted above, the issues were confined to the garage, A. the fact the Tenants could not
establish the L. was aware in September 2023 as alleged.
17. I also find T. the Tenants are entitled to the filing fee of $48.00 as sought.
18. As to the other remedies, again as noted above given they field to provide any receipts F.
the damaged property I am not satisfied they have proven the out-of-pocket expenses
claimed.
It is ordered T.:
1. The L. shall pay the Tenants $1,698.00. This amount represents:
• $1,650.00 F. a rent abatement F. the period ending January 5, 2025.
• $48.00 F. the cost of filing the application.
2. The L. shall pay the Tenants the full amount owing by March 6, 2026.
3. If the L. does not pay the Tenants the full amount owing by March 6, 2026, the
L. will owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from March 7, 2026 at
4.00% annually on the balance outstanding.
4. The Tenants have the right, at any time, to collect the full amount owing or any balance
outstanding under this O..
February 23, 2026 ____________________________
Date Issued Kelly Delaney
Member, L. A. T. Board
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor
Toronto ON M7A 2G6
O. Page 3 of 4
File Number: LTB-T-088912-24
If you have any questions about this O., call 416-645-8080 or toll free at 1-888-332-3234.
O. Page 4 of 4